Category Archives: history & provenance

No Expert “Got it Right”

Posted on January 6, 2023 by proto57

Number 9 on my list of Modern Voynich Myths states that when the 2009 radiocarbon test revealed a date range of 1404 and 1438, it showed the previous experts guessed the date correctly. But this was, and is, utterly incorrect. … Continue reading →

Posted in Dating the VMs, history & provenance, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | 3 Comments

The 1910 Voynich Theory is Gaining Momentum

Posted on July 19, 2022 by proto57

After more than ten years of researching the possibility that the Voynich is a circa 1908 to 1910 forgery by or for Wilfrid himself, many of the concepts I have originated, and which, in many cases, can be traced directly … Continue reading →

Posted in history & provenance, optics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 52 Comments

The Sources for the Voynich Forgery

Posted on April 12, 2021 by proto57

In my second to last post, I explained the reasons I believe that the popular quasi-historical 1904 work The Follies of Science at the Court of Rudolph II served as the “primer” used to create the Voynich Manuscript. Although the … Continue reading →

Posted in Dating the VMs, history & provenance, Rosicrucianism, Uncategorized | 1 Comment

The Voynich has no Provenance

Posted on April 19, 2020 by proto57

There is no written evidence that can be used as provenance for the famous and enigmatic Voynich Manuscript. Although it is claimed that certain 17th century mentions of a manuscript are the Voynich, on close examination these fail to satisfy … Continue reading →

Posted in Dating the VMs, history & provenance | 18 Comments

The Modern Forgery Hypothesis

Posted on March 23, 2016 by proto57

Although I’ve mentioned various aspects of my Modern Forgery Hypothesis for the Voynich Manuscript over the last few years, both here and on the Voynich Mailing List, I have never posted a summary of it. This is an attempt at … Continue reading →

Posted in codes and ciphers, Dating the VMs, history & provenance | Tagged , , , | 46 Comments

The 1665 Marci Letter: A Forgery?

Posted on September 11, 2015 by proto57

One of the keystone items of evidence used to support the claims that the Voynich Manuscript is a genuine, ancient work, is the 1665 Marci-to-Kircher letter which Wilfrid Voynich said he found in the book. But does this letter deserve … Continue reading →

Posted in Dating the VMs, history & provenance | Tagged , , , , , | 19 Comments

The Three Quire Theory

Posted on August 4, 2015 by proto57

Over the last year or so I’ve begun to wonder if the bifolios of the Voynich Manuscript may actually be cut from some larger folio stock, which was originally in the form of three or four large, blank quires. If … Continue reading →

Posted in history & provenance | Tagged , , , , , , | 16 Comments

The Origins of the Dee Myth

Posted on July 22, 2015 by proto57

A commonly recurring element of the Voynich provenance story is that the famous astrologer, alchemical and seer, John Dee, probably owned the manuscript, and brought it to the Court of Rudolf II in the late 16th century. This anecdote is … Continue reading →

Posted in history & provenance | Tagged , , , | 4 Comments

Sowerby’s Philippovitch

Posted on June 2, 2015 by proto57

In E. Millicent Sowerby’s 1967 autobiography, Rare People and Rare Books, she gives us a wonderful insight into the world of bookselling in the 20th century. We are lucky that she includes a vivid description of her time with Wilfrid … Continue reading →

Posted in history & provenance | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Modern Voynich Myths

Posted on May 8, 2015 by proto57

When I first learned of the Voynich Manuscript back in 2006, there was a certain, accepted baseline understanding of what it might be. This foundation was supported by many different factors, both real and assumed, or some combination of both. … Continue reading →

Posted in Dating the VMs, history & provenance | Tagged , , , , , , | 9 Comments